We must be clear here:

• The Bible in both the Old and New Testaments were written by Hebrew speaking Prophets and Disciples. With all respect to previous opinions, all Bible Books were originally written in Hebrew or Aramaic languages. Not Greek, and definitely not Latin. Opinions that hold that any Bible Book was originally written in Greek is a lie, prejudicial and hints of Jew-baiting. Yahuwchanon may have had the ability to speak and write in the Greek language. After all, he was there at Pentecost and received the gift of languages. But he would write in his mother tongue and translations would be made to cater to Greek-speaking readers.
• Translation of the Bible into the languages of the world has made a tremendous impact in the world's ability to relate to the Bible since a large part of peoples in every generation are not educated in foreign languages.
• The shame and even tragedy is the terrible complication of the modern Ivriyt (Hebrew) language! Satan, goaded all Jewry to adopt all kinds of spellings and pronunciations of Ivriyt words and letters! For non native Yahuwdiym like us, the question becomes, which Ivriyt flavor should we learn? How useful will that flavor be in the overall context of understanding everything 'ancient' about the people and our religion?
  Some will spell "Moshe"; others, "Musha", "Mosheh", "Mosha"; all refering to the one we all call "Moses" in the English Language. The challenge here really is this: even a single letter difference in spelling, changes the meaning of any Ivriyt word! Today, in spite of the preponderance of biblical evidence, the Yahuwdiym are so much more concerned for their respective schools of thought, than they are to humbly decide on the true and accurate pronunciation of the Divine Names for the Father and the Son. They have unbelievably complicated something so simplified by Scripture. Spellings easily derivable from Scripture, that as non-Yahuwdiy as we are, we are able to figure it all out without fear of any honest contradiction. This website holds the Father's Name as " YaHuWaH"; and the Son's Name as "YaHuWshuaH". The following do not meet the divine Name specifications: For the Father - "Yahuwa", "Yahweh", "Yehovah", "Yahua"; and for the Son - "Yahshah", "Yehoshua", "Yahushua", "Yahusha", "Yashua". This is how confused Jewry has become! We can truly afford to be very 'dogmatic' about the divine Names - YaHuWaH and YaHuWshuaH. We have incontrovertible proof for our position.
  Even the Jewish Calendar became so awfully corrupted that lots of Yahuwdiy people have pretty much developed and adopted something different, as the Karaite Sect did. Be advised that the Yahuwdiym (Jews) cannot today offer any serious Disciple any kind of example or guidance that you can safely depend on. None.
  But, in spite of all these, the Ivriyt "Hebrew" Language should be the only language for all Yahuwdiym and Natsariym (Christians) for Worship and for Bible research and study. The relationship between Ivriyt and Aramaic is a direct one. I am learning Ivriyt (Hebrew), will you?

A look at many prefaces in Bible translations, will reveal that at least from an outsider's point of view, those who decide to make a translation do so with the best of intent, and assemble seemingly very qualified language and theology talents and scholars to accomplish the task. But it is also not disputable that other groups of language and theology talents would disagree with their work and proceed to produce their own. In this, they hope that their version or translation would be better. It hardly ever ended there. Today, it is claimed, by Wikipedia, that there are over 450 English Bible translations in the world! What if there are 450 Spanish, 450 Portuguese, 450 French, 450 Igbo language translations and same in every language and dialects in the world? You get the idea? It would be ridiculous if not downright dangerous. No one would read any of them because, let's face it, which one should they read?

Translations are a disaster! This is not a denial of their usefulness in Bible literacy, but a statement of their theological consequences on readers. Translations and their varied interpretations are the reasons there are literally as many denominations as there are villages in the world! No one denomination agrees with the other in much of anything except in this one issue: Jesus! Satan allows this because it is a name of his own choosing. It is not the Name of the Savior! If they believe differently and practice differently, why are they still being regarded as of the same religion? They shouldn't.

Firstly, it begins with Translators' confusion in handling the original languages. Each Translator decides what meaning to give to each Hebrew or Aramaic word! Hardly ever do two of them give the same meaning to the same word except in cases of Version improvements as different than translations. Why is this so? May be, it is human nature to subjectively accord meaning to words. May be it is bias. Which is it? Trying to find answers to these questions may not help us very much at this stage. But we would be best served if every one reads the Bible in Hebrew and Aramaic. Most people in every economy or society speak more than one language or dialect. Who then says that people cannot learn and speak and write Hebrew or Aramaic? Only Satan would say that. From their childhood, every Muslim learns Arabic along with whatever their mother tongue is. Who deprived "Christians" of this tremendous advantage? Gadriel (Satan). Muslims rarely rely on or even allow individual interpretations of their Quran! It is not needed. Everyone reads it in its original language. Yes, they have English translations of their Quran and perhaps other world languages. It is not relied upon at all. Natsariym need to revert to the Ivriyt language for Worship and Bible Studies.

Satan, taking advantage of this fire that he lit, has totally corrupted Scripture to the extent that finding Truth in many Bible translations today is nigh impossible! Without belaboring the issue, make an effort to compare the Rheims Douay Version and the King James Versions; the New World Translation and the New International Version; the Bible in Basic English and Young's Literal Translation. So you see that it is no wonder that many have given up all together deciding that the Bible is a "Fraud"! It is NOT A FRAUD! That is how Satan designed his assault on the Kingdom of YaHuWaH. If you think that it is too late or too challenging for you to learn Hebrew/Aramaic language today, then, procure a Concordance along with a Bible that has like "Strong's" numbers. Then, when in any doubt, you can you use the "Numbers" and research the "Word" or "expression" and come to your own personal conclusion as to the meaning of the text you are looking at. Trust no Translation. However, the one and only King James Version (KJV) is the one that you pick up and read without fear of being doctrinally misled. See next section for more depth.

Any attempt to itemize the corruptions of texts of Scripture here will be tantamout to writing a new book. This will be no help at all. But you can have the details from a scholarly work on this. Please download Battle Of the Bibles.
It has what you need: a full count of the corruptions as at the time the Book went to press. Since then, new translations have entered the market. And more corruptions are adding woe to woe.
It is the corruptions of the Bible text that produced catholicism and resulted in the Reformation. Have you compared catholicism with the 'Jehovah' Witnesses, lately? Have you compared Methodism with the Baptist Church lately? Have you compared the Cherubim and Seraphim with your typical Pentecostal? What did you find? It is disheartening to say the least. Oh! It must be noted that Satan recognizing that his cover is blown, is now working to unite denominations on his terms. Ecumenism.

If you are reading the New World Translation, you will be taught that the name of the Author and owner of the Book is Jehovah! If you are reading most any other translation, chances are that you will be taught that his name is GOD! To add to the babel of opinions, if you are reading from a regular Ivriyt (Hebrew) edition of the Bible, you may find that His name is either "G-D" or "haShem"!

But, none of the above is the name of the true Author of the Bible. The name which is supposedly translated into "GOD" is the Ivriyt (Hebrew) word "Elohiym". "Elohiym" is a title, one title among many titles ascribable to the Creator of the Universe. The two words share no relationship whatsoever! The word "GOD" is said to have its origin in what is now Germany. It is the name of an ancient Germanic deity. See this page for details. Suffice it to say here that the word "GOD" is in truth the personal name of Satan camouflaged by spelling but remained faithful to him in pronunciation. see the figure below.

Satan's personal name is not Satan or the Devil or Heylel, which are all titles, but "Gadriel". See Chanoc (Enoch) 69:6. As a disguise, his servants shortened it to "GAD" and replaced "A" with "O" to blur the link! But the pronunciation as shown above remained faithful to the shortened version of his name.

The Creator's Name is "YaHuWaH" See Shemoth (Exodus) 3:15

6,823 times, our Father mentioned His Name in the Bible. 6,823 times, Satan, using men, removed his name and replaced It by Satan's name! Satan's plan outlined in YeshaYahuw 14:12-14 was fully implemented. In many other places in Scripture, the Creators' Name was replace by the English word "LORD"! This action is terribly mystifying. On what grounds was this decision made; to put in Satan's other name in place of the Creator's Name? "LORD" translates from "BA'AL"! How does Ba'al take the place of YaHuWaH? How? The takeover of the Bible was complete. Men continued making pretenses of worshiping the Creator, many unwittingly, and many others, gloating over the success of their agenda! In Chizayon (Revelation) 13:4, men worshiped Satan the Dragon while to them they were worshiping the "Beast" - Catholicism! That's how deep the camouflage is!

4. "And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshiped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?"

According to Daniy'el 11:45, Satan using his servants would take over the Church ("plant the tabernacles of his palace ... in the glorious qadosh mountain")!
In 2 Thessalonians 2:4, Satan, using, the "Beast", would sit in the Temple of Elohiym, making himself "elohiym"!

4. "Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called elohiym, or that is worshiped; so that he as elohiym sitteth in the temple of elohiym, shewing himself that he is elohiym."

Would you allow this high treason to continue?

The Canon is the set of rules that are used to decide which Writings are legitimate and should be in Scripture? How are the rules made? Who made them? Obviously, these questions are anything but easy to answer. Essentially because, Satan is busy goading different parties of his servants in all directions. One group in one way, another group in another direction. Satan doesn't care which way. He cares nothing for the truth. He is the Father of lies! See Yahuwchanon (John) 8:44. His interests are served by confusion; anything but the truth.

Ideally, whatever spiritual writing that harmonizes with all Scripture; that does not contradict any other anciently accepted sacred writing, should be among them. Any book or writing that has anything in them, which contradicts a jot or tittle in the anciently accepted Scriptures can have no place in the Bible. But what are we seeing? I own a wonderful translation titled "Eth Cepher". It has 87 Books. The regular Bibles have 66 Books. Looks like 21 added Books! How so? We are not condemning "Eth Cepher", far from it. It seems to be something of what the Bible should be today, representing centuries of divine light that have graciously been given to the world. But, by what set of rules were these additional 21 Books permitted to be part of the Bible? One contradiction by one of those books of another, would consign the entire Bible to a nearby dustbin! That would do Satan just fine! The Books are referred to as "Apocriphal" and "Pseudepigriphal", much of them seemingly validated simply by being found among the "Dead Sea Scrolls". For generations in Bible theology, they were rejected as part of the Canon. But, even then, Catholic Bibles did include many but not all of them. Today, the floodgates are open. Why?

In the early days of "Christian theology", only the Books that were always part of the "Tanakh", the ancient Hebrew Bible, and those written by the Apostles of HaMashiach were permitted. Taken together, any ancient Books not referenced by YaHuWshuaH and his Apostles should not make it. Many of the 21 Books earlier mentioned do not meet this test. Still, on another hand, it baffles the honest student of the Word, as to the reason why the Books of Chanoc (Enoch) and Yasher (Jasher) were kept out of the Bible. To some of us, these two Books do meet every parameter: referenced by the Apostles in the New Testament. It was due to their removal that Satan found the environment conducive to foisting a lying Astronomy on the world. The flatness of the Earth and original Calendation are forcefully presented in those two Books.

Names of People and Places should never be translated. For general relationship with Names in one language by another language, they may be transliterated. In other words, the sound of the Name should be reproduced in every other language. In that way, pronunciation is preserved. But sadly, for inexplicable reasons, Scripture names were casually translated! With the disastrous consequence of loss of meaning, pronunciation, and historical linkage!

Satan lost the plot when he failed to remove the expression "HalleluYah" from the Bible. It must be said that Elohiym could never allow Satan to run away with his plan. Elohiym knew the plan even before Heylel hatched and proclaimed them. By infinite wisdom, Elohiym outsmarted Heylel and had many clues of HIS true name in the Scriptures in spite of Satan's best efforts. Today, almost all biblical names of persons and places have been restored. Many, accurately restored while for a few others, research continues.

What does "Isaiah" mean? What does "Jeremiah" mean? What does "John" mean? Does the English word "Moses" mean "drawn from the water"? Does "Isaiah" mean "YaHuWaH is my Deliverer"? No. They are meaningless English words used to hide the Creator's Name. This in turn made it easy for Satan to steal the Bible, albeit, for a limited time. If men had from the beginning known of the biblical names of the individuals and places, Satan would not have been able to usurp the Bible the way he successfully did for over 2,000 years! HalleluYah, the plan has failed. Now we know our Father's Name; the name which is above all names; the name that HIS Mashiach inherited; the name by which HIS people are named; the Tower to which the righteous can run and be safe; the name which whoever one of us today calls upon, assures us of salvation.

"Amen" For "Amein"
Egyptian Deity (Amen-Ra) In Place of YaHuWshuaH (The Amein)

"Amein":

Means: "So be it", "verily", "Surely".

"Amen":

Means: Originally, "the hidden one who is in heaven" to the Thebans; "the hidden one"; "the hidden sun".
"the god of life and procreation", 'supreme deity' - according to Funk and Wagnalls', Standard College Dictionary.
"The chief deity of Egypt, the supreme divinity; the hidden god" worshiped as amen-Ra, according to James Bonwick in the book, 'Egyptian Belief and Modern Thought', pp. 123-125
amen-Ra is the same deity the Phoenicians referred to as Ba'al.

The word in the Bible translated "Amen" is a greek word. It is the word with Strong's number G281. It is spelt "Amen". Its origin is said to be from a Hebrew word with Strong's number H543. But, the Hebrew word is Pronounced "aw-mane" and spelt "Amein". Question is, why the seeming misspelling? An honest mistake? Or treason?

First of all, YaHuWshuaH, the Son of Elohiym was a Yahuwdiy, not a Greek. The "Amein" is a Person. The "Amen" is also a 'person'; an Egyptian deity!

14. And unto the Angel of the assembly of the Laodiceans write;
    These things saith the Amein, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of YaHuWaH;

YaHuWshuaH HaMashiach, the Son of the Living Elohiym, is the "Amein". The Translators of the Scriptures could not claim ignorance of this reality. They chose to dispense with the "I" in the Title of the Savior and rendered it exactly in the name of an Egyptian deity - "Amen-Ra"!
Amen-Ra is an Egyptian Sun Deity as seen in the definitions above! Are all these actions by Translators happenstances? Not likely at all. On the contrary, it is a collossal conspiracy to hijack Elohiym's Word and divert worship to Satan!

So, when we pray and terminate it with the "Amen", we believe that we are invoking the Savior to seal the certainty of the answer to our prayers. But unknown to many of us, all this while, we were invoking, not the Savior, but Satan who the Egyptian deity "Amen" represented! It is only by Elohiym's matchless grace that our Prayers are answered when seal our prayers with the 'Amen'! But at some point, it is expected that we should study; we should know; we should question. If that time passes and we demonstrate zero spiritual curiosity and intensity, our prayers will be left to be directed to Satan whom we seemingly prefer. The counterfeiting is diabolical.

Trinity Denies YaHuWshuaH's Post-Calvary Work For Us

Every student of the Bible would know that there is not one single text in all of Scripture that mentions or teaches the Trinity! Elohiym is Not a Trinity. Elohiym is One. Period. Elohiym is the Father. The Father and the Son are One and the same person.

But there are texts most people refer to, to assert existence of a Trinity. Truth is that those texts were faked and included in the Scripture. Again an affirmation of the grand conspiratorial corruptive activity of the confederacy of Evil. You may help this study by scanning several Bible translations to compare what they write about those verses referenced. If you are not prepared for a shock, you may be in for a rude awakening. We will not be repeating this study here. See this study in full on this page titled the Set-apart Spirit.